Environmental issues such as high carbon
emissions from building activities increased the urgency of green building
application. The system that is used to assess the performance of green
buildings is called Green Building Rating Systems (GBRS). GBRS have spread in
various parts of the world, from Europe to Asia. However, existing studies on
comparisons of GBRS are limited to weight analysis of the most recent version
of manuals. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to fill the gaps in the
comparative studies of the Green Building Rating System, especially regarding
changes in indicators, underlying issues, and potentials for future
developments.
This writing specifically contains a comparative analysis of the International GBRS (BREEAM, LEED, DGNB) with the GBRS from Indonesia (Greenship). LEED-based comparisons were made by reviewing the indicators and sub-indicators of each GBRS from the instruction manuals. The result of this comparison shows that the disclosure of the number of points is a crucial aspect in the assessment process. This study also shows that the high cost of certification does not always indicate a for-profit institution. In addition, every GBRS that is compared has room to grow, especially from other GBRS.
Keywords: Green Building Rating Systems, LEED, BREEAM, DGNB, Greenship
Author: Raisa Putri Alifa – Architecture







